“The yellowed diary’s notes whisper in vernacular.
They sound the forgotten posture,
the cramped cry that forces me to hear that voice.”
Jayanta Mahapatra’s poem is a touching work, a poem almost
autobiographical in nature as it deals with the delicate topic of religious
conversion. Her grandfather’s diary is a sort of memoir that recounts how he
turned his back to his religion and his ancestors due to the primitive
motivation of hunger. Hunger was the compelling force that during Orissa’s
famine of 1866 caused this man to give up and embrace Christianity.
You left your family behind, the buried things,
the precious clod that praised the quality of a god.”
It is unsettling to say the least that a man is forced into
conversion due to hunger. There is a certain inhumanity in it and you wonder
how can religion be so dross and materialistic to count the number of
convertees with promises of food rather than seeing people crying for food in
their bellies? The tongue of the diary is in vernacular and through language
the diary conveys the cry of a man who was forced into doing something that
must have caused him extreme pain and self-reproach.
Dead, empty tress stood by the dragging river,
past your weakened body, flailing against your sleep.”
When one looks at the tile of the poem there is an
expectation raised that perhaps it is some sentimental song of love for someone
passed by. Instead, the song is of one who has died long ago and the poet is
deciphering things long past but yet terribly relevant. What one can clearly
see is the politics of the world that does not care for the cries of people.
The imagery of the poem is what makes it as moving as it is: Did you hear the
young tamarind leaves rustle/ in the cold mean nights of your belly?
What Hindu world so ancient and true for you to hold?
Uneasily you dreamed toward the centre of your web.”
They sound the forgotten posture,
the cramped cry that forces me to hear that voice.”
“How old were you? Hunted you turned coward and ran,
the real animal in you plunging through your bone.You left your family behind, the buried things,
the precious clod that praised the quality of a god.”
“the cracked fallow earth, ate into the laughter of your
flesh.
For you it was the hardest question of all.Dead, empty tress stood by the dragging river,
past your weakened body, flailing against your sleep.”
“The imperishable that swung your broken body,
turned it inside out? What did faith matter?What Hindu world so ancient and true for you to hold?
Uneasily you dreamed toward the centre of your web.”
What does religion or faith matter in the end if the body
itself is unable to get even basic necessities? In fact, what is religion
indeed? It seems to have been transformed into a mere worship of God leaving
aside the fact that people are starving and falling on the wayside. There is a
certain inhumanity that can be seen throughout the poem. Her grandfather does
manage to save his life through conversion but his heart is forever burdened by
the deed he has done when it is he himself who is the victim. Neither his own
religion nor the one he adopts is able to do the basic thing any religion
should i.e. provide comfort.
Good write up. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteYou have no idea who Jayanta Mahapatra is! It is 'he' not 'she'. Get your facts clear.
ReplyDeleteHahahahah
DeleteIt's just a typing mistake.
Deletesome lines are different... so i cant understand it ....
ReplyDeleteand yes/... it is 'HE' not 'SHE'
Hahahah
DeleteGdd
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, Jayanta Mahapatra is male. Secondly, Grandfather is much more than you described. Sorry, No offence!
ReplyDeleteTrueee....
DeleteWhat is your website
Deleteyou have taken the right order to analyse a poem in a simple way which be understood by all but here, there is some infirmation about the poem which is to be discussed nicely n should take care about the authors as well.... a good effort
ReplyDeleteIt is he not she
DeleteWorst..😂😂
ReplyDeleteSend your summerization bro
DeleteGoog summarization😍
ReplyDeletewhere is the rest of the poem? half of the poem is no there only!
ReplyDeleteNot a good summary of the poem.Analysis is myopic, almost bad.Needs pruning and polishing.
Delete2 to 3 paragraphs are ok but rest are useless i thought to take some idea from it bt its not worth....
ReplyDeleteAre u a gebaram who don't have idea u fool
ReplyDeleteThe lines were not in proper order.The author is a male person,it includes some ideas and concepts regarding the poem.Anyway good attempt.Please go through the topic carefully because many of the students are using it for their studies.
ReplyDeleteNot a good analysis.Needs improvement.
ReplyDeleteI think the rest of the comments on here does not understand how any poem is to be interpreted by themselves and not to be relied on somebody else for an explanation. And funny enough, they've got lots of problems with this one.
ReplyDeleteApart from the poet being mistaken for a female, everything else suffices. Thank you for this!
good summarization but please correct the gender of jayanta
ReplyDeleteit is a HE not a SHE
THANKS!!
There are lots of information that are lacking but the analysis was quite ok u can refer to the analysis from this site also: https://tedlitspot123.blogspot.com/2021/12/grandfather-by-jayant-mahapatra.html?m=1p
ReplyDeleteBEST
ReplyDeleteGood
ReplyDeleteNice Explained 😊😚
ReplyDelete